However, this may reduce the defendant`s liability for costs. For NDCs, the principle of compensation applies, so the claimant cannot recover more costs than he has to pay to his own lawyer. Therefore, if the agreed contingency fees are less than the amount determined by a traditional cost calculation, the defendant only has to pay the lower amount. Depending on your condition and the details of the agreement, the conditional fee may vary from 5% to 50% of the final premium. However, the lawyer does not charge a fee if his client is not successful. The lawyer`s payment depends or “depends” on the benefit of the case. Rule 4 provides that a DTA cannot require the client to pay anything other than “payment”, which is limited to 50% of collection, and payments not related to a lawyer. This suggests that if there is no claim, the lawyer cannot have any claim other than payments unrelated to the lawyer. Therefore, if a lawyer agrees to act under a DTA, it must be a complete agreement “without gain or costs”.
For example, in the United States, contingency fees are based on the contractual agreement between the attorney and the party. The costs are calculated as part of the possible damage judgment or comparison that the customer has received. The percentage allowed as contingency fees is subject to ethical rules of ethics, which require that attorneys` fees be reasonable and subject to legal restrictions in certain circumstances.  In some jurisdictions, contingency costs ranging from 33% to 45% of recovery may be considered reasonable. Lawyers who charge unreasonable fees may be subject to professional sanctions. .